MultiversX (EGLD)

THIS IS NOT HOW MARKETS WORK! i can't believe i really have to explain that, as this was a so obvious gaslight imo that i didn't think anyone would really buy it however, i see a lot of posts from the multiversx community celebrating this post, so here we go: being correlated to BTC is not in anybody's control this is simply how markets and economies work EVERYTHING IS CORRELATED liquidity flows from one asset or one economy to another all the time and everything is kind-off correlated because of investors/traders/mms behavior -- not one small Foundation's plans delisting EGLD/BTC pairs has no economic effect in "decoupling" EGLD price to Bitcoin movements because both are paired to the USD and traders/mms are arbitraging these pairs nevertheless Lucian's post has little to do with a revolutionary strategy by the MultiversX Foundation -- and a lot to do with Binance deciding to delist a low-volume and low-liquidity pair to protect their users (as stated by Binance itself in the official announcement) IT IS A GASLIGHT he only wants to flip (another) bearish news for EGLD into something positive, as they have done for a long time IT IS A GASLIGHT just another lie from the mincus brothers (among many that i and others have documented over the years) Lucian is taking all of you for fools some of you are really being fooled while others are becoming accomplices, knowing it's a lie and still amplifying it to fool even more people unserious project

A clarification, because you deserve precision. Yesterday’s post drew fair challenges that I want to address directly. Removing a pair does not remove a correlation. That is correct. Delisting EGLD/BTC does not, on its own, break the link to Bitcoin. Correlation is broken by what an asset earns on its own merits, not by which pairs sit on an order book. So let me be exact about what this decision is, and what it is not. It is not us pretending we can command a market. It is not us hiding behind “the exchange decided.” Pairs do not stay alive on their own. They are sustained by liquidity, depth on the book, tight spreads, and that is a shared commitment between a project and an exchange. Maintaining a pair is an active cost and an active choice. We have a say in it. We are not passing blame. We made a call, and we will own it in full. And the call was this: in current conditions, holding up the EGLD/BTC book ties EGLD's price discovery to Bitcoin's volatility while returning nothing to holders. We would rather direct that effort toward where value is actually created. This is one deliberate step, not the whole strategy. The strategy is the network. The focus is the network. I will take a hard question in public before I give you a comfortable half-truth. That is the standard I hold myself to, and the one you should hold me to. ─── We move on our own terms: throughput, finality, adoption, utility. Still here. Still building.

Lucian has hidden my reply where I expose the (incredibly obvious) gaslight he is trying to pass as Binance has decided to delist EGLD/BTC and Lucian wants to make it look like an intentional decision part of a big strategy by MultiversX lol he really takes everyone for a fool https://t.co/7gvnBDA3EN

lol, unbeliveable Binance announced it is delisting EGLD/BTC due to low liquidity/volume Lucian then comes and gaslights (delibrately misleading) his community into believing EGLD/BTC delistings are part of a great strategy by MultiversX instead of just what usually happens to projects with low volume and demand these guys can't go any lower unbelievable

A majority owned company by @MultiversX in case you didn't know ofc 🙃